Obama’s $800,000 payment to ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now - and $832,598 to its affiliate Citizens Services, Inc. during the primaries help increase the democratic voter registrations. But are all of them legit? Not so according to the Federal Election Commission that is intensively investigating allegations of fraud all coming from ACORN’s submittal of said registrations, especially to the battleground state of Ohio.

In Cuyahoga County, which includes Cleveland, is presently reviewing 65,000 voter cards, submitted by ACORN, after 50 of them have shown duplicate names, fictitious addresses, noncitizens and recycled names, stated Mike West, the board spokesman. Ohio counties are starting their own probe as well.

Citizens Services and ACORN are working hand in hand. They even share the same address in New Orleans and the same executive staff with money flowing in from all three branches (because that what they are basically even though they use different entities) the Project Vote, the Citizens Services and ACORN.

ACORN was instrumental in endorsing Obama for president.

The downside of it is that ACORN is nor being investigated for possible fraud in bogus voter applications in dozen states, many of them battlegrounds.

ACORN stated that if fraud occurred it was not done intentionally. The voter canvassers were paid for each registration and they might be the guilty ones.

“We worked with the election officials to root out employees that are ripping us off,” said Brian Mellor, legal counsel for ACORN and Project Vote. “We did everything we could do and some election officials dropped the ball and now are blaming us.”

Possibly, but then where is their quality control? I cannot believe that ACORN does not take extreme measures to prevent such colossal fraud that can reverberate badly on their institution but also rig a presidential nomination which is such a crucial decision the American people put their heart into.

IS ACORN FRAUDULOUSLY HELPING OBAMA?
By S.A. Miller (The Washington Times 10/10/08)
Abstract by Johana Nadler

click here to view article

The “New Party” (NP) is the result of a “fusion” of the Democratic Party and leftist group founded in 1992 with 7,000 members. An anti-capitalist party of ex-Communists, socialists and activists from ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), a hard-left group, helped Obama start in politics in 1996 when he won a state senate seat. The interesting fact is that the NP does not just endorse anybody; one must request an audition to be accepted. As per a 1995 update on the New Party-aligned Chicago Democratic Socialists of America web site:
“About 50 activists attended the Chicago New Party membership meeting in July. The purpose of the meeting was . . . to hear appeals for NP support from four potential political candidates.”

To get an endorsement from the NP one must “be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, candidates must sign a contract with the NP. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NP,” stated the site. Conclusion: Obama did sign on with the group and one cannot help but wonder what is he supposed to do in return? What kind of debt will he be called upon in the future? However, even more importantly is what NP platform appealed to Obama?

The NP’s statement that it was created “to break the stranglehold that corporate money and corporate media have over the political process,” sounds a little too familiar and makes one quizzy.

Obama’s change proposals sound too similar to the NP policies: a bill of rights for children, a shorter work week, a universal “social” wage and military spending cuts. What does it tell you? Parents will have to forfeit their parental rights; welfare will go up, and our nation’s security will be in dire jeopardy.

Americans should seriously scrutinize Obama and stop being blinded by his charisma and wild promises and ponder how his communistic views added to the new development of Russia invasion of Georgia, without forgetting his plan to talk with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. And let’s not forget China, who just like Russia is hiding behind a mask of hospitality for the Olympic Games but is nonetheless is totalitarian and corrupt government with no respect for human rights and has no qualms to deceive (at least it thinks so) the world. Obama might have his views on it too to further his plans, and why not, China is communist just like…

OBAMA’S “CHANGE” AGENDA ROOTED FROM THE REDS
By Investor’s Business Daily (6/17/08)
Abstract by Johana Nadler
click here to view original abstract